From: Jose Kahan (jose.kahan@w3.org)
Date: Wed Nov 27 2002 - 09:59:48 CST
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 05:50:33PM -0800, Peter C.McCluskey wrote:
>
> Jose, the changes you made to attachment names didn't work, so I removed
> that part of your changes. Your code was using a pointer to the prior
> message to generate attachment names. This core dumped if the first
> message had an attachment, otherwise the attachment index file matched
> the attachments with the wrong message. I didn't see an easy way to get
> it to work with your hashed names, so I just fixed it to work with the
> default config. The set_nonsequential option probably still mishandles
> attachments.
Thanks for the bug report. You forgot to mention which parts of the
code you suppressed. Was it this fragment in parse.c?
2254,2255c2252,2254
< trio_asprintf(&att_dir,"%s%c"
DIR_PREFIXER "%04d
",
< dir, PATH_SEPARATOR, num);
--- > trio_asprintf(&att_dir,"%s%c" > DIR_PREFIXER "%s", > dir, PATH_SEPARATOR, > message_name (emp)); Could you mail me a test message to help me fix the bug? Thanks! -jose