Re: [hypermail] hypermail 2.1.4 and folder_by_date

---------

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Peter C. McCluskey (pcm@rahul.net)
Date: Fri Jun 28 2002 - 13:58:08 CDT


 hadmut@danisch.de (Hadmut Danisch) writes:
>Hi,
>
>I just tried the folder_by_date option with
>hypermail 2.1.4.
>
>Is it intentional oder to be considered as a bug
>that the mail-html-files are put in the given subdirectory,
>but the attachment-folders are still kept in the main
>directory?

 It was intentional, but not the result of much thought. It was more the
result of laziness and an assumption that attachments are sufficiently
uncommon that they don't create oversized directories very often.
 It could probably be changed if there are good reasons to do so.

>BTW: Is there any way to make hypermail use
>5 or 6 digit numbers instead of only 4?

 It would probably require changing "%4d" to something else in a few dozen
places.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter McCluskey          | Free Jon Johansen!
http://www.rahul.net/pcm | 


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

---------

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.