Re: Suggestion: Retain attachment filenames when possible

---------

From: David Booth (dbooth@w3.org)
Date: Sun Dec 01 2002 - 13:51:54 CST

  • Next message: David Garamond: "Re:"

    Awesome! I look forward to trying the new version!

    At 05:55 PM 11/26/2002 -0800, Peter C. McCluskey wrote:
    > dbooth@w3.org (David Booth) writes:
    > >When an HTML document is sent to list that is maintained by hypermail, the
    > >image links are broken in the archives, even if the images are also
    > >included as message attachments. For example, see:
    > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Nov/0083.html
    > >This occurs because hypermail adds a numeric prefix "01-" to each
    > >attachment filename. I assume this is done in order to insure that the
    > >filenames are unique (in case the same file was attached more than once).
    > >
    > >It would be REALLY nice if the numeric prefix were added ONLY if the
    > >attachment names were non-unique. This would make it possible to send an
    > >HTML document and its images as message attachments and have them show up
    > >properly in the archives.
    >
    > I've checked in some changes which should do that.
    >
    >--
    >------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >Peter McCluskey | Free Jon Johansen!
    >http://www.rahul.net/pcm |

    -- 
    David Booth
    W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
    Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
    

  • Next message: David Garamond: "Re:"

    ---------

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5.