From: Daniel Stenberg (daniel@haxx.se)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 01:12:05 CST
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Peter C. McCluskey wrote:
> It's been 3 weeks, and I haven't seen any other volunteers for the job.
> So if I don't hear any objections soon, I will try to assume the role I
> described earlier.
I'm totally with you on this.
> Does this look like the right sequence for implementing the branch?:
> edit patchlevel.h to VERSION "2.0.0"
I don't see why we necessarily need a branch already. Having the 2.0 labeled
up nice and clean is enough right now IMHO. Then, if we would need to release
a patched 2.0 we could take that decision later.
> cvs commit patchlevel.h
> cvs rtag -b 2.0.0 hypermail
You won't be able to tag with a label containing dots, but otherwise it is a
good idea! Perhaps "release-2_0" is good enough.
> maketgz
The script fixes the VERSION string.
I'd suggest that we do it in the order:
* maketgz (builds a release-archive)
* upload the release-package
* cvs commit
* cvs rtag -b
* continue developing in the main branch
I think that there's also an important issue we must take care of soon:
* cleanup the web pages
--
Daniel Stenberg - http://daniel.haxx.se - +46-705-44 31 77
ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol