From: Peter C. McCluskey (pcm@rahul.net)
Date: Sun Feb 11 2001 - 20:04:17 CST
daniel@haxx.se (Daniel Stenberg) writes:
>Let me suggest that we do this in some kind of organized way. We take
>volounteers for taking on the maintainer's role and then we vote on the
>nominees. We give the process like three weeks and when the time's up we go
>with the winner and may the source be with us!
>
>Or what do you guys say?
It's been 3 weeks, and I haven't seen any other volunteers for the job.
So if I don't hear any objections soon, I will try to assume the role I
described earlier.
Ashley, can you give me CVS write access?
Does anybody object to branching the current code into a 2.0 stable release
and a 2.1 head for new features?
Does this look like the right sequence for implementing the branch?:
edit patchlevel.h to VERSION "2.0.0"
cvs commit patchlevel.h
cvs rtag -b 2.0.0 hypermail
maketgz
upload to sourceforge
edit patchlevel.h to VERSION "2.1a0"
cvs commit patchlevel.h
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Peter McCluskey | Fed up with democracy's problems? Examine Futarchy: http://www.rahul.net/pcm | http://hanson.gmu.edu/futarchy.pdf or .ps