From: Crispen, Bob (Robert.Crispen@HSV.Boeing.com)
Date: Wed Dec 13 2000 - 11:20:51 CST
Tom von Alten[SMTP:tom_vonalten@boi.hp.com] sez:
> Daniel Stenberg writes:
> > If we were to release hypermail 2.0
> > non-beta, I'd say that would be the b30 renamed to 2.0.
>
> Assuming that what Daniel meant to say was
>
> "Let's release 2b30 as version 2.0,"
>
> I'll second the motion. :-)
>
<aol>Metoo.</aol> Let's leave the attachments index
for 2.1 until we've had a better chance to test it. As of
now the changes I sent to Daniel have only been tested
on Sun/Solaris. I don't expect any gotchas on other
platforms, but you never know.
Btw, I've created a new .hmrc variable, attachmentsindex
which you can set true or false. Wanna guess what it
does?
> On the subject of subindexing messages with attachments, it sounds
> like a reasonable idea (for v2.1), especially for those who find
> themselves in Bob Crispen's sort of situation where "useful" and
> "non-useful" breaks down neatly along that line.
>
Yup. Especially if it's optional.
Bob Crispen
bob.crispen@boeing.com