![]()
From: Daniel Stenberg (Daniel.Stenberg@frontec.se)
Date: Thu Oct 14 1999 - 15:48:28 CDT
Hi
I'm still doing research on the 'missing_thread' mailbox problem. The problem
is pretty simple to describe:
1. The thread index requires a mail that is not a reply to start a thread
with.
2. The function hashreplynumlookup() (struct.c:362) does it best to look up
possible replies.
3. In the problematic mailbox we have identical subjects "Re: Beschwerde" in
all three mails, but only one of them with a In-Reply-To: header.
A few selected headers from the three mails:
Subject: Re: Beschwerde
In-Reply-To: <m0vB8kj-0009PcC@relay.Boerde.DE>
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.961010183109.52177A-100000@graf350.urz.uni-magdeburg.de>
Subject: Re: Beschwerde
Message-Id: <m0vC2i2-0009PcC@relay.Boerde.DE>
Subject: Re: Beschwerde
Message-Id: <m0vB8kj-0009PcC@relay.Boerde.DE>
4. All this taken together, mail 0 is considered the reply to message 2 and
the other two are considered replies to mail 0.
I really can't see any good way out from this. Other than not match that
willingly on subjects, but that will make hypermail less effective when
clients that don't support in-reply-to and similar are used.
Anyone with ideas or suggestions around this?
--
Daniel Stenberg - http://www.fts.frontec.se/~dast
ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
![]()