From: Bernhard Reiter (bernhard@uwm.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 30 1999 - 02:35:13 CST
Hello Daniel,
sorry that I didn't answer to most of your mails, but I am not on the
mailinglist. So here my response.
On the (m|s)printf issue:
Of course should a limiting variant be
choosen. This was my whole point from the beginning. I just didn't
bother to completely read through the mprintf() stuff and could'nt
be sure that there might be something build in. :)
On the license issue:
Well I think that I know quite a bunch about all the different
free software licenses. That is why I like the GPL. But again, you are
right, we should not discuss it right now. I just saw that a bunch of
files still had different license issues attached and wanted to point
that out.
On the testing and release issue: I had hoped that the CVS would also
include the more experimental code, so that I can get a chance to see
some of it. Otherwise the chances are high that my little python script
was all for nothong, because Kent already implemented a nicer version.
One more: I still think that hypermail should also save the
full mail body part additionally, when there is an OpenPGP(PGP/MIME
rfc2015) signed Mail. If we do it first, maybe somebody enhances a
webbrowser to take advantage of it. Would be cool, if it could check
the signature then.
Cheers,
Bernhard
-- Research Assistant, Geog Dept UM-Milwaukee, USA. (www.uwm.edu/~bernhard) Free Software Projects and Consulting (intevation.net) Association for a Free Informational Infrastructure (ffii.org)