From: HyperMail_www@associate.com
Date: Mon Mar 15 1999 - 19:20:56 CST
Has anyone else noticed that HTML files generated by HyperMail are not
date-stamped in the name? That's obvious. But on a site where the
HTML archives are rotated daily, the lack of date-stamping can make new HTML
files appear to be read, even though they are new (if they've been read
within the last few days, for example).
I've never done wildcards in C before (is it possible?) But my thought would
be to add a "seconds" stamp, like that in the lock file, to the HTML
file names. Something like 0000-12657890.html
The seconds "field" could be ignored by the counting routines, and included
when creating the indexes.
Just an idea.