From: jose.kahan@w3.org
Date: Mon Dec 20 1999 - 10:12:33 CST
Hello Kent,
In our previous episode, Kent Landfield said:
>
> Interesting. This should not be too big a deal to do as you seem to be
> just adding to options. What about the default, non-CSS uses ? Will the
> formating that's there be generally the same if no external CSS support
> is available or enabled ?
Yep, it was just two new options and adding two new printf where we print
the header + changing one paramenter in that function (I think it's
print_main_header) so that we can distinguish between index and message
CSS. It's working ok, but I haven't committed it yet, due to lack of
time until Wed. morning.
Non css-users won't see any of the special style, just the plain one
that results from the standard interpretation of an HTML file and any
hard-coded style that it contains (e.g., <BODY ...>.
CSS is designed to degrade gracefully :)
> No objection here as long as it generally appears the same if CSS is not
> enabled.
Yep, that's what it does, you get the same thing as today (I didn't
change anything else :)
Thanks for the go-ahead.
-Jose