From: Tom von Alten (tom_vonalten@boi.hp.com)
Date: Thu Aug 19 1999 - 12:22:22 CDT
This recent discussion reminds me of a basic benefit of the approach we took
in enhancing v1.02 - we had an ".attachments" subdirectory, and attachments
to message NNNN went in a subdirectory for that message,
.attachments/NNNN/
The only potential for name conflicts is if someone attaches two files with
the same name to a message. I think the optional prefix of "att-" is a good
idea, if the implementor wants to avoid the risk of someone being cute with
attached files.
Cheers,
_____________ Hewlett-Packard Computer Peripherals Bristol
Tom von Alten mailto:Tom_vonAlten@boi.hp.com
This posting is for informational purposes only.
It is not a statement of the Hewlett-Packard Co.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hypermail@landfield.com On Behalf Of Paul Haldane
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 3:30 AM
>