Re: rewriting the getname() function again

---------

From: Daniel Stenberg (dast@sth.frontec.se)
Date: Sun Apr 18 1999 - 07:10:39 CDT


On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Paul Haldane wrote:

> I have a from line that I reckon the parser handles wrongly

Ah, you're right.

I've changed it now to only scan for ()-comments if there was no <>-address
found in the line.

In a first glance, it seems to make your lines work better and I couldn't see
any other examples fail because of it either.

As soon as we have something here that might work, I'll add it to the
hypermail parser and release a new tar-ball. Many problems will be solved
with this.

(Oh, right, the mime-decoding can be ignored by this parser since that'll be
performed separatly before the function is called.)

Thanks for your feedback!

--
             Daniel Stenberg - http://www.fts.frontec.se/~dast
   ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol



---------

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5.